The positive approach to FLISOL

[Santiago Roza]

dos ejemplos de cualquier verdura que la osi aprobo como open source,
pero la fsf dice que no son libres (y sus razones):
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html


 NASA Open Source Agreement
    The NASA Open Source Agreement, version 1.3, is not a free
software license because it includes a provision requiring changes to
be your "original creation". Free software development depends on
combining code from third parties, and the NASA license doesn't permit
this.

 Reciprocal Public License
    The Reciprocal Public License is a non-free license because of
three problems. 1. It puts limits on prices charged for an initial
copy. 2. It requires notification of the original developer for
publication of a modified version. 3. It requires publication of any
modified version that an organization uses, even privately.


-- 
Santiago Roza
santiagoroza at gmail.com