[FSFLA] Building alternatives to neoliberalism in Latin America today
Quilro Ordonez
quiliro en riseup.net
Mar Jun 21 02:03:47 UTC 2016
El 2016-06-20 11:23, willi uebelherr escribió:
> Am 20/06/2016 um 11:55 schrieb Quilro Ordonez:
>>
>> I don't understand why you say that "rapid development" will not allow
>> people to decide for themselves. It is a methodology for making
>> desisions. It is not vertical or horizontal. Also, you have not
>> answered
>> my previous questions.
>
> Dear Quiliro,
>
> this specific discussion is not important for WSF, Martha and Michael.
> And i am not sure, that it will be important in the FSFLA list.
>
> "Rapid Development" or "Rapid Application Development (RAD)" or the
> same? I don't know, what term you use and have.
>
> But the core is to reduce the development time. And Barry Boehm and
> his friends started in a very buerocratic environment. Maybe, you
> think, because you have in Latin America the same shit environment as
> a dominant factor therfore you have to go the same way?
>
> I think now. Concentrate to that, what is important. Put away all,
> what is not important. Open the space for the people to unfold her
> capacity. Move away the dominance of looking only for private
> richness.
>
> In Latin America, you can start with that. You don't need to
> reorganize the european shit. Therefore i ask you? Why you want always
> be a slave of the european (this is the base for north america)
> thinking systems?
I do not understand what Eourope has to do with:
1. agreeing on a basic plan
2. implementing the plan
3. making a new plan based on the results
4. repeat #2
This has nothing to do with any doctrine. It is just a technique which
can or cannot be used. The problem usually is that many people make
plans and don't even implement them on their own space. The important
thing is to be consistent with our objectives instead of trying to make
others do as we plan.
Más información sobre la lista de distribución Discusion