[FSFLA] my proposal to Mozille: InterNet, the Inter-connection of local Net-works

[Quiliro]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 23:36:15 -0300
willi uebelherr <willi.uebelherr at riseup.net> wrote:

> my first question is, why we should use the planetary reference, if
> we act only on the earth ball.
>
> And based on this lack of understanding i have big problems to follow 
> your proposal.
> 
> To the facts. We have a ball, this ball have a center and a radius.
> All are average values.
> 
> The radius is ca 6370 km, the circumference ca 40.000km, the surface
> is ca 500*10^6 km^2 = 500*10^12 m^2 = 500*10^18mm^2
> If we devide the surface with 2^64 = 27mm^2
> 
> We are both clear, that the WCS-84 is not a good model, because it is 
> based on triangles with the basic lines on the equator and the top on 
> the pol.
> 
> To have a continuous resolution, we can use a 2-dimensional or a 
> 3-dimensional system. I prefer the 2-dim system, because it is easier.
> 
> We can use the equator as our horizontal circle. The zero/360 point
> can be every where. On the crosspoint with our angel we create our
> vertical circle with his center in the earth center and her turning
> points in the pols. On this circle we use our vertical angle. The
> zero/360 point is the crosspoint with the equator.
> 
> With 32bit for every circle, h and v, we have 40.000km / 2^32 = 9mm.
> The differenzes to our surface value comes from the inaccuracy of my
> used numbers.
> 
> The two point connection way is a segment of the circle with the
> center in the earth center and his connection with the two points. On
> the way, the router define the source-position with his own position.
> The destination-position is always the destination of the paket.
> 
> In a ball space this 2-dim angel coordination is always the easiest
> way. We can use it also for our transmitter antennas for automatic 
> geografical calibration.
> 
> This is the background for my short explanation in the text.
> 
> And now, please explain in steps your proposal with a planetary view.

I propose the same as you (I suspect). Please confirm from my
explanation below.
 
I propose using the same system for latitude as we use in longitude.
Using parallel circles in latitude makes each circle cover a diferent
dimensional area. If we use angular mesurement in latitude as we do in
longitude, we can have aproximately equal dimensions for equivalent
distances (considering a small difference because the Earth is fatter on
the Equator than on the poles).In longitude we use Grenwich as
reference and the poles as axises. In latitude we should use Equator as
a reference and some place like Cayambe volcano as one of the axises.
(Is axixes the plural of axis?)

> Community Server Space

> The different people in the different instances or themes organise
> the technical system together. Her own part and the common part. The 
> financial base, strong seperated from the using space, until we can 
> create our own server spaces in all communities, is based on free 
> donations around.
> 
> The core function are the different server modules, what the people
> need to run her application. For all types of applications. The 
> administration and service working is free, based on voluntary.

I agree.

> The second part now, based on our discussion of our InterNet 
> architecture and design, are the more technical questions to our 
> components. For that we need our global network for free technology.
> And with our Open Community Server Spaces we can it organise easier.
> And, based on an Open Source Audi/Video Streaming like Tox with an
> interface to other protocols we can create our global conferences
> from our living places. Of course, this is more easier with more
> regional Community Server Spaces. And this we need also for our World
> Social Forums and the themes forums like World Internet Forum.

I think we should involve the greatest number of people by using easy
information and communication technologies with federated servers.

-- 
Saludos,
Quiliro