[FSFLA] [APC Forum] Guifi.net, APC's new member in Catalonia: Creating free, open and neutral telecoms networks

willi uebelherr willi.uebelherr en riseup.net
Vie Mayo 5 18:04:55 UTC 2017


Dear friends,

this is the answer from Karel Novotny from the APC Forum. The Guifi-mesh 
list don't distribute my answer to the APC text.

many greetings, willi

QueridAs amigAs,

esta es la respuesta de Karel Novotny del Foro APC. La lista Guifi-mesh 
no distribuye mi respuesta al texto APC.

muchos saludos, willi


-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [APC Forum] Guifi.net, APC's new member in Catalonia: 
Creating free, open and neutral telecoms networks
Datum: Fri, 5 May 2017 10:19:23 +0200
Von: Karel Novotný <karel at apc.org>
An: A general information sharing space for the APC Community. 
<apc.forum at lists.apc.org>

Dear Willie,

Our new member Guifi.net is no-nonsense organisation and we are very
happy that they decided to join APC.

Guifi.net has a very strong politics around fair management of the
network, openness (including floss), commons, network neutrality, and
community ownership and management of the network. You can read a lot
about it at https://guifi.net/es/node/54226 and elsewhere on their
website where they make public everything about the principles on which
the network is built and managed.

They do a lot of technological activities, including development and
research. Many APC members have been in touch with them for years and
have benefited from what Guifi.net has pioneered and openly shared.

It is quite possible that the article on apc.org does not include some
important details about the new member organisation, and it gives a
wrong impression. And it is good that you point that out. However, I
don't think that is a good reason for sharing your (in my opinion
unfounded) suspicions about them publicly on this list. I think that
Guifi.net is actually a very good partner for the principal discussion
about telecommunications which you are calling for.

best
karel




Más información sobre la lista de distribución Discusion