free firmware mistakenly removed by LinuxLibre

[Aurelien Desbrieres]

On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 21:37 -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan  3, 2011, Felipe Sanches <juca at members.fsf.org> wrote:
> 
> > What I meant is that the kernel source shouldnt ship binaries.
> 
> Why not?  It doesn't harm any freedom to ship them along with the
> sources, and it makes perfect sense IMHO to not require people who build
> their own kernel binaries to have to have assemblers and compilers and
> FPGA tools etc for tons of different targets.
> 

Happy gnu year fsfla.org!

You mean the :

http://www.linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/2.6.36.2-libre/deblob-2.6.36

http://www.linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/2.6.36.2-libre/deblob-check

http://www.linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/2.6.36.2-libre/deblob-main

are affected too?


-- 
Aurelien DESBRIERES
http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/User:Aurelien
Freedom is not just a word, it's a duty.